Sunday, May 24, 2020

The Economic And Racial Aspects Of Slavery - 1235 Words

The Economic and Racial Aspects of Slavery Leo Kirkpatrick Baird US History I Mrs. Clark November 9, 2015 Slavery has stood the test of time; slaves were used in Mesopotamia even before they were conquered by the First Persian Empire in 539 BCE. In the Roman Empire slaves were about 10% of the total population of the Empire. The need for labor in the New World caused about 10.7 million Africans to be shipped over to become slaves. The mass usage of slaves from the 2nd millennia BCE to today where millions of slaves are still being used in countries all over the globe is an economic business. Until slavery started in the New World it was not associated with racism. In the Roman Empire slaves were multinational, as is the case with all other instances of slavery including in Greece and in Africa itself, except for in the New World. Therefore contrary to popular belief, throughout history slavery was an economic affair not a racist one. In the Roman Empire slaves were seen as a sign of wealth and were used for labor. The more slaves a household had usually showed more wealth. This labor was used to maximize profits that the owners would make from their business. If the Romans did not employ slavery they might not have been such a booming empire that they were. How the Romans treated their slaves was a lot more kind hearted than is seen in the New World; slaves became part of the family and if a slave was liked by the family the slave could be set free andShow MoreRelatedA Review of American Negro Slavery by Ulrich B. Phillips Essay1311 Words   |  6 PagesA Review of American Negro Slavery by Ulrich B. Phillips Phillips book is an attempt to provide an overview of the practice and institutions of slavery in the Americas from its beginnings to the 19th century. Writing in 1918, Phillips hoped to provide an account of slavery based upon historical evidence and modern methods of research, rather than ideological motivations. He drew his evidence from the plantation records and letters of slave owners; contemporary travel accounts; court recordsRead MoreAPUSH SLAVERY FRQ813 Words   |  4 Pages FRQ #2: Analyze the origins and development of slavery in Britain’s North American colonies in the period 1607 to 1776. The founding of the majority of American colonies was either for an economic profit or for religious freedom. To make the colonies founded for an economic profit, a large work force was needed. For many religious colonies that turned into huge economic powers, they used the Protestant work ethic. Other colonies decided to use indentured servants originally, but this ended upRead MorePast Influences that Marked Brazils Contemporary Society1679 Words   |  7 Pages This paper analyzes aspects of Brazil’s colonial history that has influenced contemporary societies. It also describes and critiques measures that have recently been implemented by the Brazilian government in attempt to curb the further deterioration of society. In Brazil’s society, neoliberal and capitalist beliefs within the social structure have hindered democratic politics. Diverse social groups are unable to come together and exert their political power as a united front, instead, the neoliberalRead MoreThe Development Of Virgin Lands Required Cheap Labor Essay1213 Words   |  5 Pagesthe world was slavery. Since the fifteenth to nineteenth centuries, slavery was a means through which the whites subject the black people of color into oppressive states. â€Å"The development of virgin lands required cheap labor. Defenseless Africa then became the readymade reservoir†¦ to draw that labor force† (Diop 24). Black people were put through endless pains and hardships without even haven an identity in the eyes of their slave masters and the community in which they dwell. Slavery which is oneRead MoreSlavery Is An Important Chapter Of American History910 Words   |  4 PagesSlavery is an important chapter in American histo ry, and its influence can be seen in the roots of our government and laws. Slavery is a prejudice based on race. It is also economic exploitation; the act of forcing other individuals to work for no pay. While slavery was ultimately abolished, restitution in the form of freedom was not compensation enough for the wrongs, nor could it remove the very ideal of slavery from our nation’s foundation. The effects of slavery continue to influence theRead MoreSlavery, Colonialism and Capitalism783 Words   |  3 PagesSlavery, Colonialism and Capitalism, it can be said that there is a relationship between these three systems. There are many different views on this topic, the main views being the Liberal-pluralists and the Radical revisionists who understand this relationship from different perspectives. To prove the connection between these three systems that impacted many countries this essay shall make close reference to a number of sources. Cedric Robinson (1984: 57) discusses the fact that slavery lead toRead MoreAmerican Tragedy And That Devil History1539 Words   |  7 Pageseven mean. Henry Louis Gates thinks it s meaningless and that talking about race means recognizing how race is intertwined with U.S. History. In an interview for Salon Gates said that since slavery ended all political movements have been about race. American conservatives have been stuck on that since slavery ended a century and a half ago they need to get over it, move in, and embrace the benign American exceptionalism. Liberals have tried to justify the value of white guilt. That includes theRead MoreComplicity: How the North Promoted, Prolonged, and Profited from Slavery902 Words   |  4 PagesAmerica and is often glorified in its struggle against slavery; however, a lesser-known installment of the Northern involvement during this era is one of its complicity in the development of a â€Å"science† of race that helped to rationalize a nd justify slavery and racism throughout America. The economic livelihood of the North was dependent on the fruits of slave labor and thus the North, albeit with some reluctance, inherently conceded to tolerate slavery and moreover embarked on a quest to sustain and legitimizeRead MoreRacial Discrimination : The And Public Order Perspectives1103 Words   |  5 PagesContemporary American Society because racial tolerance continues to be a clear trend in American society. In the past six years, there has been a significant positive change in the perceptions of both African Americans and Caucasians regarding the present state of race relations. The change in attitudes have reached the point where an African American has participated in the race for presidential election and won. Many of the issues that are presently important to racial minorities are issues faced by lowRead MoreMulti Cultural And Multi Racial1476 Words   |  6 Pages Running Head – Caribbean Multi-cultural and Racial The Multi-Cultural and Multi-Racial Caribbean Michelle Knight Essay Submitted for Caribbean History 27100 Professor Audra Diptee Carleton University June 14, 2016 The Multi-cultural and Multi-racial Caribbean The Caribbean islands are a group of diverse islands throughout the Caribbean Sea. These islands can be as far south as the northern South America and as far north as southern North America. These islands

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Women s Armed Services Integration Act - 1159 Words

Women now make up 14 percent of the active-duty military in the United States, which is up from 1.6 percent, 25 years prior. (Christian Science Monitor, 1). In 1948, President Truman signed the Women s Armed Services Integration Act which created the role of women in the military. This law meant that each branch of the service was allowed to have one female Colonel (Byfield, 12). As of 2015, there are many women who serve as Generals and Admirals. All of these roles are non-combative. Even though some women can do anything a man can do, the vast majority can not, therefore making it an unsafe idea to place these women into combat positions. Women hold many diverse positions in the armed forces. The vast majority of women work in areas†¦show more content†¦In terms of modern-day combat, women do not have an equal opportunity to survive.(Messay, 3) Some argue that it is a women s right to be in combat, but anyone will agree that equal opportunity does not play part in combat. Feminists and their supporters want to gender-neutralize the military be incrementally ditching common sense policies. This latest study, which claims that women can be trained to be like men, contributes to this misguided ideology, weakens the force structure at its core, and puts America s military personnel in peril. continues Lt. Col. Maginnis. (Messay, 3) When we try to force and shove women into dangerous situations, we are ignoring their rights instead of protecting them. The dropout rate for women is higher than for men. Leading the dropout rates are white women with an average rate of 43%, followed by black women at 33% and Hispa nic women with 31% (Park). This can be directly pointed to the physical demands that a women faced in basic training. The possibility of women becoming prisoners of war is more likely to happen. One case in which this happened is of Melissa Rathbun-Nealy, a military trained truck driver. During the Gulf War, she was stationed in Dhahran. The Iraqis captured her and held her for 33 days before she

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The events that occurred in Derry on January 30th 1972 became known as Bloody Sunday Free Essays

The events that occurred in Derry on January 30th 1972 became known as Bloody Sunday. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations? The straightforward answer is because at present historians do not know precisely what happened on Bloody Sunday. The basic facts are clear. We will write a custom essay sample on The events that occurred in Derry on January 30th 1972 became known as Bloody Sunday or any similar topic only for you Order Now These are that on 30 January NICRA (Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association) planned to hold a civil rights march in Londonderry to protest against Internment (the imprisonment of suspected terrorists without a trial.) British troops opened fire, killing thirteen people and wounding several more. However there are many different interpretations of who started the violence and who was to blame for the events of Bloody Sunday. The Northern Ireland government had banned all such marches, the year before, but the marchers were determined to go ahead anyway. Besides, few Catholics took much notice any longer of the Northern Ireland government. The marchers were unarmed, but when they reached barricades that had been put up by the army to stop them leaving the Bog side, they began to throw stones and shout insults at the soldiers. Snatch squads were sent in to arrest troublemakers, but shooting broke out. Afterwards the soldiers claimed that they had come under fire from flats alongside the road, but the marchers claimed that the soldiers had opened fire first. Thirteen marchers were killed and another thirteen were injured. Each side blamed the other for the disaster. The soldiers claimed that the IRA, which had used the march as a means of provoking a response, fired them on first. Catholics believed that the army had deliberately attacked the marchers. Source C supports that view because it tells of soldiers being heard before Bloody Sunday, talking about â€Å"clearing the bog†, which is referring to Derry’s bog side. However the source also shows that the information could be unreliable as it took place in a pub and could just be hearsay. The Republicans of Northern Ireland are seen by some to be determined to humiliate the British authorities by demanding an independent investigation, which is still on going today. Until recently, the British Government has always accepted the view of the British Army, shown in the ‘Widgery Report’, that its soldiers had simply fired in self-defence after being fired at by IRA gunmen. Nationalists claim that the British soldiers were unprovoked and opened fire either in response to some imaginary threat or, as a deliberate act of violence The two sides give a different view because of who they are and what they want. The only known truth is that the British government sent troops to Northern Ireland to control the violence between Protestants and Catholics. Whether they did that or not, once in Northern Ireland, the British army quickly became a target for IRA rebel attacks. It therefore was appropriate for the British authorities to support the accounts of the soldiers policing the march who claimed they acted in self-defence. They viewed themselves as ‘carrying out their duties as a peacekeeping force’, and blame the IRA terrorists, who had already carried out many attacks on the Ulster Constabulary and British Army in Northern Ireland. Nationalists, especially Sinn Fein and the IRA, regarded the British Army as an Army of ‘occupation’. In their view, the British Army’s presence in Ireland was itself an act of aggression so in their eyes the Nationalist community had every right to protest against it. Their interpretation of Bloody Sunday is that the soldiers’ response to the marchers was the act of an aggressive invasion force trying to put down legal protest against an illegal occupation of Ireland. It reflects their view that Republicans were not simply terrorists, but occupied in a justifiable armed struggle against British aggression. In the Widgery report the government claimed, † Each soldier was his own judge of whether he had identified a gunman.† A Catholic priest at the scene claimed that he saw no one shooting at troops. He claimed that he saw the British Army shoot without selecting targets, â€Å"it was a massacre.† Due to his religious tendency one would expect him not to make up such a statement, however someone writing a report concluding the true actions of Bloody Sunday would have to question the priest’s reliability, because like many others present at Bloody Sunday there is the possibility of a one sided or biased view. The report went onto state â€Å"some soldiers showed high degrees of responsibility, [some] firing bordered at the reckless.† Part of Source A supports the military claim that soldiers simply responded when they came under fire. One former soldier stated how the so-called new evidence was being brought up, but the nail bombs and acid bombs he claimed were used against them were not mentioned. He made a valid point that thousands of people had been on the streets of Derry that day, and that if they had been firing so indiscriminately as people have said, then why were there no women and children killed? Several prominent Nationalists were at the scene and claim to be eyewitnesses to the British army’s aggression, but it is questionable as to whether their version of events can be trusted without independent evidence. Source K for example reflects the idea of the soldiers shooting everywhere around them without any provocation. The paratrooper responsible for shooting Damien Donaghy, stated he had â€Å"intended to shoot dead† a man he was â€Å"convinced was a nail bomber.† However he admitted he â€Å"could have shot the wrong man† or that one of the shots he had fired hit Mr. Donaghy â€Å"by accident†. Damien Donaghy, 15 at the time of Bloody Sunday’s events, denies that he was carrying any nail bombs or other weapons, but was without doubt shot in the thigh in Derry’s bog side during the civil rights march on the day soldiers shot dead 13 Catholic men and boys who were said to be unarmed. Source B supports his view as it weakens claims about supposed nail and acid bombs being used, due to new forensic evidence suggesting that the Widgery reports findings could have been caused by contamination such as emissions from car exhausts. When two groups oppose each other, interpretations are bound to differ, however another cause for the difference in interpretation is that because Bloody Sunday happened 31 years ago, all the buildings are different now and the place itself cannot be used as evidence to support either side’s statements. Source I is therefore an example of a valid piece of evidence as it shows a reconstruction of Derry’s bog side and can portray the bog side as it was, which is needed to support peoples accounts. Interpretations may differ because people hear, see and experience things differently and so for example a gun being fired by a soldier could have triggered other soldiers to open fire if they had cause to believe it was a civilian or member of the IRA. Currently, the only people who know the truth are those who carried and used weapons on that terrible day and their commanders, both British Army officers, possibly acting on the orders of the British government, or the IRA leadership. This is why the â€Å"Saville Inquiry† has been set up by the British government as part of the current peace process to try to find out the truth behind Bloody Sunday. How to cite The events that occurred in Derry on January 30th 1972 became known as Bloody Sunday, Papers

Monday, May 4, 2020

bipolar disorder in kids Essay Example For Students

bipolar disorder in kids Essay Determining Bipolar Disorder in children is harder then adults because of the mistakes doctors make in their diagnosis. All kids have mood swingsis it Bipolar Disorder? Psychologists of today are having problems diagnosing children with Bipolar Disorder because the symptoms are so different from the adult form of the disorder. In children Bipolar Disorder is called Child Onset Bipolar Disorder, known as COBPD (My Child 1). In children the cycling from highs to lows are very fast. Children will cycle between mania and depression many times a day. For adults the change from manic to depressed can take months. They often have periods of normal behavior in between their episodes of mania and depression (Bipolar 1). Bipolar Disorder is a biochemical imbalance that causes major mood changes from the highs of mania, to the very lows of depression (My Child 1). Doctors say What goes up must come down with the highs and lows of this disorder, but the cycles are very unpredictable and vary in Determining Bipolar Disorder in children is harder then adults because of the mistakes doctors make in their diagnosis. length. The times of depression and mania stages are not equal in time (Basic Terminology 1). In children only about .5% have bipolar disorder. The disorder is most common in males in children (Childhood 1). In adults one percent or about four million people of the population is affected by the disorder (Who Gets Bipolar 1). Bipolar Disorder affects women equally (Expert 1). The normal range of age that the disorder appears in is between the ages 15 and 25 (Alternative 1). The cause of Bipolar disorder is still a mystery. Doctors know that there is a strong genetic condition that may have something to do with it (Childhood 1). One of the most important things to have when diagnosing a child with bipolar disorder is to have an accurate family history (Facts 1). With one parent with the disorder they say the chances of each child having it is 15-30%, when both parents have the disorder the risk incr3eases to 50-75% of each child having it. In siblings and fraternal twins there is a 15-25% percent, and in identical twins there is about a 70% chance of having the disorder. (About Early-Onset 4). In adolescents a loss or some other traumatic event might trigger an episode of either depression or mania. Later episodes of mania or depression may occur independently because of any other obvious trigger, such as stress, or the episode may worsen with any additional added stresses. Puberty is also a time of risk for children (About Early-Onset 3). There are also factors of the persons environment, stressful life events can trigger an episode from anything from a death in the family to losing a job or Determining Bipolar Disorder in children is harder then adults because of the mistakes doctors make in their diagnosis. having a baby, or moving to a different city (Bailey 1). Nearly anything can trigger a persons change in mood, there might not be any obvious triggers at all (Bipolar 1). .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd , .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd .postImageUrl , .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd , .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd:hover , .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd:visited , .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd:active { border:0!important; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd:active , .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u8f6d47d92a7793c1f51e73da286bcbbd:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Wetland Policy Essay On average people with Bipolar Disorder, especially children, usually go through three to four doctors, and go through about eight years trying to find what works before they can obtain a correct diagnosis (Expert 1). When diagnosing a child with bipolar disorder doctors have to be very careful that they do not make the wrong diagnosis (Childhood 1). It is very tricky to make a bipolar diagnosis in children because of all the other disorders that can go along .